Prepared by: House of Testing Technical & Compliance Team
Category: IS 62368 — Electronics & IT Safety
India is currently undergoing one of the most important electronics compliance transitions in recent years.
IS/IEC 62368-1:2023 is replacing:
IS 13252 (Part 1)
IS 616
This transition affects a massive range of electronic, IT, communication, and audio-video products sold in India.
For manufacturers, importers, OEMs, startups, and compliance teams, the migration is not simply a paperwork update. The standard introduces a different safety philosophy based on Hazard-Based Safety Engineering (HBSE), which changes how electronic product safety is evaluated.
This guide explains:
what changed under IS/IEC 62368-1:2023
which products are affected
migration implications for manufacturers
common testing and compliance challenges
practical preparation strategies
why businesses should plan early
The objective of this article is not only to explain the standard itself, but also to help manufacturers understand the practical industry issues commonly observed during product evaluation, testing, migration planning, and BIS compliance activities.
What Is IS/IEC 62368-1?
Why India Is Migrating to IS 62368
Hazard-Based Safety Engineering (HBSE)
Products Affected by Migration
Major Technical Changes
Common Compliance Problems
Migration Checklist
Practical Industry Challenges
FAQs
This guide is useful for:
Electronics manufacturers
Mobile and laptop brands
Importers and OEM suppliers
CCTV and networking equipment companies
Smart device manufacturers
Product compliance teams
Testing and certification departments
Foreign manufacturers exporting products into India
Amazon and Flipkart electronics sellers
IS/IEC 62368-1 is a safety standard covering:
audio-video equipment
information technology equipment
communication technology equipment
consumer electronics
smart devices
networking products
The standard combines concepts previously covered under:
IS 13252
IS 616
into a unified framework.
Manufacturers handling electronics compliance in India should also review the Complete Guide to BIS CRS Certification in India to understand broader BIS registration requirements applicable to electronic products.
Older standards were based heavily on:
prescriptive construction rules
fixed engineering approaches
separate product classifications
Modern products increasingly combine:
IT functionality
communication systems
wireless connectivity
audio-video capability
smart features
battery systems
networking functions
IS/IEC 62368-1 was developed to address this convergence.
The migration also aligns Indian electronics safety requirements more closely with international compliance frameworks.
One of the biggest changes introduced under IS/IEC 62368-1 is the shift toward:
Instead of evaluating products only against predefined construction rules, the standard evaluates:
energy sources
transfer mechanisms
safeguards protecting users
The framework classifies:
electrical energy
thermal energy
mechanical energy
into different hazard levels.
| Classification | General Meaning |
|---|---|
| ES1 | Low-risk energy source |
| ES2 | Potentially painful but not harmful |
| ES3 | Potentially hazardous energy source |
| TS1 / TS2 / TS3 | Thermal energy classifications |
| PS1 / PS2 / PS3 | Mechanical energy classifications |
The standard evaluates how safeguards prevent users from exposure to hazardous energy.
The migration affects a very large range of products.
Examples include:
laptops
desktops
tablets
televisions
CCTV cameras
routers
networking products
smart devices
adapters
SMPS
power banks
Bluetooth speakers
gaming devices
projectors
docking stations
OTT devices
communication equipment
| Product Category | Common Applicable Standard |
|---|---|
| Laptops & Computers | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| Mobile Phones | IS 16333 + IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| CCTV Cameras | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| Power Banks | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| Audio Video Equipment | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| Routers & Networking Devices | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
| Adapters & SMPS | IS/IEC 62368-1 |
Manufacturers dealing with appliance-related compliance should also review the Complete Guide to ISI Mark Certification in India where applicable.
The standard introduces classifications such as:
ES1
ES2
ES3
for electrical energy.
Similar approaches apply to:
thermal hazards
mechanical hazards
The standard evaluates:
basic safeguards
supplementary safeguards
reinforced safeguards
rather than relying only on fixed construction requirements.
Battery-related evaluation is increasingly important for:
smartphones
power banks
IoT devices
portable electronics
wearable devices
Manufacturers frequently underestimate the impact of battery quality, thermal behavior, and charging system design on compliance outcomes.
Critical components and insulation systems require careful review.
Manufacturers often underestimate the importance of:
insulation coordination
thermal management
enclosure materials
certified components
power supply stability
In practical industry scenarios, manufacturers commonly face issues such as:
hardware changes after testing
incorrect adapter ratings
unstable SMPS behavior
inadequate insulation spacing
inconsistent labels and markings
non-approved battery configurations
mismatch between submitted and production versions
insufficient technical documentation
improper series model grouping
Many delays occur not because products are fundamentally unsafe, but because product documentation, tested samples, production versions, and declared specifications fail to remain technically aligned.
| Evaluation Area | Typical Focus |
|---|---|
| Electrical Safety | Shock protection and insulation |
| Temperature Rise | Thermal stability |
| Battery Safety | Charging and abnormal conditions |
| Construction Review | Mechanical integrity |
| Adapter Evaluation | Power stability and ratings |
| Marking & Labeling | Compliance consistency |
| Component Review | Approved critical components |
| Abnormal Operation | Fault condition safety |
A significant percentage of practical compliance failures involve:
low-quality adapters
unstable SMPS construction
inconsistent output ratings
improper protection systems
adapter substitutions after testing
In many real-world cases, manufacturers unknowingly create compliance risks by changing adapters or power supplies after certification activities are completed.
| Requirement | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Finalized hardware version | Prevents retesting |
| Stable adapter specifications | Reduces report mismatch |
| Verified battery details | Important for safety evaluation |
| Finalized label artwork | Prevents documentation queries |
| Approved critical components | Improves technical consistency |
| Proper technical documents | Reduces approval delays |
| Stable BOM configuration | Important for surveillance consistency |
| Correct series strategy | Avoids grouping problems |
Manufacturers preparing these elements early generally experience smoother migration and fewer compliance delays.
Some recurring issues observed across the industry include:
excessive temperature rise
inadequate creepage and clearance
unstable power supplies
poor enclosure construction
weak insulation systems
low-quality lithium battery integration
improper earthing arrangements
inconsistent labeling practices
These problems often become visible during abnormal operation and stress evaluation.
Manufacturers delaying migration planning may later face:
overloaded laboratory schedules
longer testing queues
documentation bottlenecks
shipment delays
redesign pressure
import clearance issues
Businesses preparing early generally achieve:
smoother testing
better documentation alignment
improved production stability
reduced compliance risks
faster approval timelines
In many practical situations, manufacturers assume that products compliant under older standards will automatically satisfy IS/IEC 62368-1 requirements without significant evaluation.
However, migration frequently exposes issues involving insulation systems, adapter quality, thermal behavior, construction details, battery integration, and safeguard implementation that may not have been evaluated similarly under older frameworks.
The migration is expected to significantly influence:
electronics product design
component sourcing
safety engineering practices
battery integration standards
quality expectations
global harmonization efforts
Manufacturers already aligned with international compliance systems may experience smoother transition compared to businesses relying on outdated product safety practices.
IS/IEC 62368-1:2023 represents a major shift in electronics safety philosophy
The migration affects a very large range of electronic and smart products
Hazard-Based Safety Engineering introduces new evaluation concepts
Adapter, battery, and component consistency are critical for compliance
Documentation alignment plays a major role during migration
Early preparation significantly reduces delays and retesting risks
Production versions must remain aligned with tested samples and approved specifications
Manufacturers approaching migration proactively with stable hardware, strong documentation discipline, and proper compliance planning generally experience smoother transition outcomes.
The industry is transitioning toward IS/IEC 62368-1:2023.
Migration requirements depend on product category and existing approvals.
A large range of electronics and audio-video equipment categories.
No. EMC compliance may require separate evaluation.
Because it introduces Hazard-Based Safety Engineering concepts and broader energy-based evaluation.
Yes. Adapters, SMPS systems, batteries, and related components play a major role during safety assessment.
House of Testing supports manufacturers and importers through testing and compliance services across electronics, electrical products, batteries, LED products, appliances, automotive components, and related safety standards.
The laboratory supports BIS-related testing across multiple standards and product categories relevant to the Indian market.